Rented normally, it costs you £579 a month. That is £6,943 a year, every year you hold it.

Will it pay?Calculator

The mortgage alone costs more than the whole rent — you top up £579 a month

It is £579 a month short. Borrowing £106,817 less would close that shortfall — which is £106,817 more cash at the start, on top of the deposit.

+£976−£1,182−£373−£579

Rent inMortgageRunning costsShort by

The rent covers £976 of that — you cover £579

◧ market rent £976 · 9 comps2 empty weeks a year assumed

What if I change my assumptions?The dials

At the asking price, 25% deposit, 6.50% charged

Change any of these 16 and every card on this page changes with it. The 6.50% is the 5.75% quoted plus a company premium.

◧ worked out from local rents

What will it cost me to buy?Breakdown

£99,347 + refurb costs

And about £34,715 more over five years, because it loses £579 every month you hold it — before any repair. That already assumes the rent never falls.

£99,347 to buy it

deposit · stamp duty · solicitor · fees~£1,350, unseen

□ works not inspected

What would have to be true?The search

No offer makes this pay

Even at £174,570 — well below the £290,950 asked — the rent still does not cover the costs. The gap is the rent against the running costs, not the price, so negotiating does not close it.

◧ worked back from the rent■ stamp duty re-bandedtested down to £174,570

What will the rent borrow?Lender test

The rent carries £103,554 of the £218,213 loan

That £114,658 is yours to find on top of the deposit. Tested at 125% instead of 145% — a company or a basic-rate taxpayer usually is — the gap is £98,089. Lenders test the rent at 7.5% and need it to cover 145% of the payment.

£1,978 needed

more than the £938 rent

stressed at 7.5%, 145% cover

◧ rent after empty weeks £938PRA-style test

Who has to say yes?Council record

Preston council approves 97% — 93% on a cautious reading

A council-wide rate, not a forecast — and Preston council refuses schemes that sandwich a family home. Check both neighbours.

97%

0%50%100%

never approvesalways approves

the band is the cautious reading of the same 152 decisions — as low as 93%

■ Article 4 — planning permission requireddecision record held for this authority

How big is it, really?The plan

The rooms are on the plan; the total is not

The plan is on file; the floor area is not.

□ no floor area published

Is it a good location?Open the map

No school rated Good or better in this postcode area

5 schools in this postcode area, none rated Good or better and flood risk checking… — open for the map, the schools and the rest.

Article 4Planning permission required to let by the room

■ postcode area, not this address

What could kill thisThe checks

The council here has taken away the automatic right to rent this out by the room

You would have to apply for permission first, and the council can say no.

2 problems found · 2 came back clear · 4 we could not check · 1 does not apply to this property

■ from the Article 4 maplisting last seen 18 Sep 2026

Which strategy wins?The ways to run it

Every way loses money — Rent by the room loses least, at £222 a month

Rent by the room needs £26,000 more cash than the others.

Rent by the room−£222 · £126,697 in

Standard rental−£579 · £100,697 in

Housing-benefit rent−£889 · £100,697 in

Each row: money kept a month, then the cash it ties up. Not compared: Do it up, then remortgage (pays back at the remortgage) · Short-stay let (no local short-let data) · Guaranteed council rent (no scheme in this borough) · Buy, improve & sell (pays out on sale)

◧ 3 ways, one measureranked on money kept each month, at the asking price

What would you walk away with, after 5 years?The five-year sums

−£42,369 after five years on the cash you put in, before tax on the sale

Less than the same cash would have made in a savings account, after tax on the interest. The savings account’s capital is not at risk; the property’s is. A fall of about 23% in the price would leave nothing from a sale after selling costs, and you would still owe the lender any shortfall. That is the £100,697 you put in. The 5-year fix runs past this 5-year hold, so the rate reset comes after it.

−£100,697+£322,201−£8,055−£218,213−£37,606−£42,369

Cash you put inSale valueSelling costsMortgageRent lossesYou are down

◧ 2.0%/yr growth assumed