Rented normally, it costs you £101 a month. That is £1,212 a year, every year you hold it.

Will it pay?Calculator

You top up £101 a month — the mortgage takes 70p of every pound of rent

Borrowing £18,643 less would close that shortfall — which is £18,643 more cash at the start, on top of the deposit.

+£1,154−£813−£442−£101

Rent inMortgageRunning costsShort by

The rent covers £1,154 of that — you cover £101

◧ market rent £1,154 · 28 comps2 empty weeks a year assumed

What if I change my assumptions?The dials

At the asking price, 25% deposit, 6.50% charged

Change any of these 16 and every card on this page changes with it. The 6.50% is the 5.75% quoted plus a company premium.

◧ worked out from local rents

What will it cost me to buy?Breakdown

£67,200 + refurb costs

And about £6,059 more over five years, because it loses £101 every month you hold it — before any repair. That already assumes the rent never falls.

£67,200 to buy it

deposit · stamp duty · solicitor · fees~£10,627, unseen

□ works not inspected

What would have to be true?The working

£20,000 off and it stops losing money

At the asking price you feed it £101 a month. At £175,137 the rent covers everything — leaving stamp duty of £9,760 at that price.

offer £175,137

asked £200,000

◧ worked back from the rent■ stamp duty re-bandedrounded down to £5,000 — the rent it works back from is an estimate

What will the rent borrow?Lender test

The rent carries £122,440 of the £150,000 loan

That £27,560 is yours to find on top of the deposit. Tested at 125% instead of 145% — a company or a basic-rate taxpayer usually is — the gap is £7,969. Lenders test the rent at 7.5% and need it to cover 145% of the payment.

£1,359 needed

more than the £1,110 rent

stressed at 7.5%, 145% cover

◧ rent after empty weeks £1,110PRA-style test

How big is it, really?The plan

One figure, and nothing checking it 689 sq ft

Only the agent’s figure exists for this house. Open for what that means.

□ area unchecked — agent’s own

Is it a good location?Open the map

No school rated Good or better in this postcode area

4 schools in this postcode area, none rated Good or better and flood risk checking… — open for the map, the schools and the rest.

Article 4Not assessed for this address

■ postcode area, not this address

What could kill thisThe checks

You would need a licence from the council first

Letting without the council’s licence is an offence, and the fee is in no figure here.

2 problems found · 2 came back clear · 4 we could not check · 1 does not apply to this property

■ from council licensing registerlisting last seen 19 Sep 2026

Which strategy wins?The ways to run it

Rent by the room beats Standard rental by £173 a month

Let it to the council: £1,416 a year less, but they keep paying when it is empty.

Rent by the room+£72 · £103,827 in

Standard rental−£101 · £77,827 in

Guaranteed council rent−£219 · £77,827 in

Housing-benefit rent−£454 · £77,827 in

Each row: money kept a month, then the cash it ties up. Not compared: Do it up, then remortgage (pays back at the remortgage) · Short-stay let (no local short-let data) · Buy, improve & sell (pays out on sale)

◧ 4 ways, one measureranked on money kept each month, at the asking price

What would you walk away with, after 5 years?The five-year sums

−£11,659 after five years on the cash you put in, before tax on the sale

Less than the same cash would have made in a savings account, after tax on the interest. The savings account’s capital is not at risk; the property’s is. A fall of about 26% in the price would leave nothing from a sale after selling costs, and you would still owe the lender any shortfall. That is the £77,827 you put in. The 5-year fix runs past this 5-year hold, so the rate reset comes after it.

−£77,827+£228,443−£5,711−£150,000−£6,564−£11,659

Cash you put inSale valueSelling costsMortgageRent lossesYou are down

◧ 2.0%/yr growth assumed