Rented normally, it costs you £62 a month. That is £745 a year, every year you hold it.

Will it pay?Calculator

You top up £62 a month — the mortgage takes 57p of every pound of rent

Borrowing £11,454 less would close that shortfall — which is £11,454 more cash at the start, on top of the deposit.

+£501−£284−£279−£62

Rent inMortgageRunning costsShort by

The rent covers £501 of that — you cover £62

◧ market rent £501 · 25 comps2 empty weeks a year assumed

What if I change my assumptions?The dials

At the asking price, 25% deposit, 6.50% charged

Try your own numbersLive

You keep-£62/mo

All-in cash£35,514

PaybackNever

Offer−+

Deposit−+

Mortgage rate−+

Rent−+

Worked at 6.50% — 5.75% quoted plus a company premium.

◧ worked out from local rents

What will it cost me to buy?Breakdown

£24,750 + refurb costs

And about £3,723 more over five years, because it loses £62 every month you hold it — before any repair. That already assumes the rent never falls.

£24,750 to buy it

~£10,764

deposit · stamp duty · solicitor · feeswe haven’t been inside

□ works not inspected

What would have to be true?The working

£15,000 off and it stops losing money

At the asking price you feed it £62 a month. At £54,722 the rent covers everything — leaving stamp duty of £2,736 at that price.

offer £54,722

asked £70,000

◧ worked back from the rent■ stamp duty re-bandedrounded down to £5,000 — the rent it works back from is an estimate

Is the price right?The deeds

Last sold for £77,000 in 2007

Nothing nearby is comparable, but asking is 9% less than the £77,000 paid for it in 2007.

□ this address’s own deeds, no comparable saleHM Land Registry Price Paid Data

What will the rent borrow?Lender test

The rent carries the whole loan — it could fall 1% and still cover it

Your deposit is what limits this one, not the rent. Lenders test the rent at 7.5% and need it to cover 145% of the payment.

£476 needed

of £482 rent

stressed at 7.5%, 145% cover

◧ rent after empty weeks £482PRA-style test

How big is it, really?The plan

The rooms are on the plan; the total is not

The plan is on file; the floor area is not.

□ no floor area published

Is it a good location?Open the map

Durham, DL4 2JY

1 of 1 school in this postcode area rated Good or Outstanding and flood risk checking… — open for the map, the schools and the rest.

Article 4Planning permission required to let by the room

■ postcode area, not this address

What could kill thisThe checks

You would need a licence from the council first

Letting without the council’s licence is an offence, and the fee is in no figure here.

2 problems found · 1 came back clear · 3 we could not check · 3 do not apply to this property

■ from council licensing registerlisting last seen 21 Aug 2026

Which strategy wins?The ways to run it

Every way loses money — Standard rental loses least, at £62 a month

Let it to the council: £240 a year less, but they keep paying when it is empty.

Standard rental−£62 · £35,514 in

Guaranteed council rent−£82 · £35,514 in

Housing-benefit rent−£173 · £35,514 in

Each row: money kept a month, then the cash it ties up. Not compared: Rent by the room (only 2 bedrooms) · Do it up, then remortgage (pays back at the remortgage) · Short-stay let (no local short-let data) · Buy, improve & sell (pays out on sale)

◧ 3 ways, one measureranked on money kept each month, at the asking price

What would you walk away with, after 5 years?The five-year sums

−£9,161 after five years on the cash you put in, before tax on the sale

Less than the same cash would have made in a savings account, after tax on the interest. The savings account’s capital is not at risk; the property’s is. A fall of about 30% in the price would leave nothing from a sale after selling costs, and you would still owe the lender any shortfall. That is the £35,514 you put in. The 5-year fix runs past this 5-year hold, so the rate reset comes after it.

−£35,514+£85,010−£2,125−£52,500−£4,033−£9,161

Cash you put inSale valueSelling costsMortgageRent lossesYou are down

◧ 2.0%/yr growth assumed