Rented normally, it costs you £164 a month. That is £1,964 a year, every year you hold it.

Will it pay?Calculator

You top up £164 a month — the mortgage takes 78p of every pound of rent

Borrowing £30,216 less would close that shortfall — which is £30,216 more cash at the start, on top of the deposit.

+£1,149−£894−£419−£164

Rent inMortgageRunning costsShort by

The rent covers £1,149 of that — you cover £164

◧ market rent £1,149 · 1 comp2 empty weeks a year assumed

What if I change my assumptions?The dials

At the asking price, 25% deposit, 6.50% charged

Try your own numbersLive

You keep-£164/mo

All-in cash£89,011

PaybackNever

Offer−+

Deposit−+

Mortgage rate−+

Rent−+

Worked at 6.50% — 5.75% quoted plus a company premium.

◧ worked out from local rents

What will it cost me to buy?Breakdown

£73,900 + refurb costs

And about £9,820 more over five years, because it loses £164 every month you hold it — before any repair. That already assumes the rent never falls.

£73,900 to buy it

deposit · stamp duty · solicitor · fees~£15,111, unseen

□ works not inspected

What would have to be true?The working

£40,000 off and it stops losing money

At the asking price you feed it £164 a month. At £179,695 the rent covers everything — leaving stamp duty of £10,079 at that price.

offer £179,695

asked £220,000

◧ worked back from the rent■ stamp duty re-bandedrounded down to £5,000 — the rent it works back from is an estimate

What will the rent borrow?Lender test

The rent carries £121,910 of the £165,000 loan

That £43,090 is yours to find on top of the deposit. Tested at 125% instead of 145% — a company or a basic-rate taxpayer usually is — the gap is £23,585. Lenders test the rent at 7.5% and need it to cover 145% of the payment.

£1,495 needed

more than the £1,105 rent

stressed at 7.5%, 145% cover

◧ rent after empty weeks £1,105PRA-style test

How big is it, really?The plan

The rooms are on the plan; the total is not

The plan is on file; the floor area is not.

□ no floor area published

Is it a good location?Open the map

Peterborough, PE1 2EJ

Flood risk checking… — open for the map, the schools and the rest.

Article 4Not assessed for this address

■ postcode area, not this address

What could kill thisThe checks

You would need a licence from the council first

Letting without the council’s licence is an offence, and the fee is in no figure here.

2 problems found · 1 came back clear · 5 we could not check · 1 does not apply to this property

■ from council licensing registerlisting last seen 23 Aug 2026

Which strategy wins?The ways to run it

Every way loses money — Rent by the room loses least, at £12 a month

Let it to the council: £1,032 a year less, but they keep paying when it is empty.

Rent by the room−£12 · £115,011 in

Standard rental−£164 · £89,011 in

Guaranteed council rent−£250 · £89,011 in

Housing-benefit rent−£490 · £89,011 in

Each row: money kept a month, then the cash it ties up. Not compared: Do it up, then remortgage (pays back at the remortgage) · Short-stay let (no local short-let data) · Buy, improve & sell (pays out on sale)

◧ 4 ways, one measureranked on money kept each month, at the asking price

What would you walk away with, after 5 years?The five-year sums

−£17,250 after five years on the cash you put in, before tax on the sale

Less than the same cash would have made in a savings account, after tax on the interest. The savings account’s capital is not at risk; the property’s is. A fall of about 26% in the price would leave nothing from a sale after selling costs, and you would still owe the lender any shortfall. That is the £89,011 you put in. The 5-year fix runs past this 5-year hold, so the rate reset comes after it.

−£89,011+£253,742−£6,344−£165,000−£10,638−£17,250

Cash you put inSale valueSelling costsMortgageRent lossesYou are down

◧ 2.0%/yr growth assumed