There is no rent on file for this address, so nothing here can be priced from one.

What if I change my assumptions?The dials

At the asking price, 25% deposit, 6.50% charged

Change any of these 16 and every card on this page changes with it. The 6.50% is the 5.75% quoted plus a company premium.

No rent is recorded for this address, so nothing here can be priced from one. Put a rent you believe into the calculator and every figure below moves with it.

□ no rent on file

What will it cost me to buy?Breakdown

£203,775 + refurb costs

£60,025 of that never comes back — stamp duty, solicitor and lender fees.

£203,775 to buy it

deposit · stamp duty · solicitor · fees~£1,350, unseen

□ works not inspected

What would have to be true?

No recorded basis for the rent to work from

Every price on this card is that rent inverted, and this row records no basis for its rent — not that the rent is wrong, but that we cannot show it was measured against nearby lettings. A price quoted to the £5,000 needs evidence we can point at.

□ rent basis not recorded

Is the price right?The deeds

Last sold for £185,000 in 2005

Nothing nearby is comparable, but asking is 211% more than the £185,000 paid for it in 2005.

□ this address’s own deeds, no comparable saleHM Land Registry Price Paid Data

Who has to say yes?Council record

Portsmouth council approves 84% — 80% on a cautious reading

A council-wide rate, not a forecast — and Portsmouth council refuses schemes that sandwich a family home. Check both neighbours.

84%

0%50%100%

never approvesalways approves

the band is the cautious reading of the same 599 decisions — as low as 80%

■ Article 4 — planning permission requireddecision record held for this authority

How big is it, really?The plan

One figure, and nothing checking it 1,636 sq ft

The advert and the survey disagree — open for both figures and the gap.

■ area measured on site

Is it a good location?Open the map

Portsmouth, PO2 0NH

3 of 5 schools in this postcode area rated Good or Outstanding and flood risk checking… — open for the map, the schools and the rest.

Article 4Planning permission required to let by the room

■ postcode area, not this address

What could kill thisThe checks

The council here has taken away the automatic right to rent this out by the room

You would have to apply for permission first, and the council can say no.

2 problems found · 2 came back clear · 4 we could not check · 1 does not apply to this property

■ from the Article 4 maplisting last seen 19 Sep 2026

Which strategy wins?

No rent on file, so nothing can be ranked

No rent is recorded for this address, so nothing here can be priced from one. Put a rent you believe into the calculator and every figure below moves with it.

□ no market renta comparison needs a rent for every way of letting it

What would you walk away with, after 5 years?The five-year sums

−£181,481 after five years on the cash you put in, before tax on the sale

Less than the same cash would have made in a savings account, after tax on the interest. The savings account’s capital is not at risk; the property’s is. A fall of about 23% in the price would leave nothing from a sale after selling costs, and you would still owe the lender any shortfall. That is the £205,125 you put in. The 5-year fix runs past this 5-year hold, so the rate reset comes after it.

−£205,125+£635,815−£15,895−£431,250−£165,026−£181,481

Cash you put inSale valueSelling costsMortgageRent lossesYou are down

◧ 2.0%/yr growth assumed