Rented normally, it costs you £225 a month. That is £2,704 a year, every year you hold it.

Will it pay?Calculator

You top up £225 a month — the mortgage takes 69p of every pound of rent

Borrowing £41,608 less would close that shortfall — which is £41,608 more cash at the start, on top of the deposit.

+£1,061−£731−£555−£225

Rent inMortgageRunning costsShort by

The rent covers £1,061 of that — you cover £225

□ service charge not published2 empty weeks a year assumed

What if I change my assumptions?The dials

At the asking price, 25% deposit, 6.50% charged

Change any of these 16 and every card on this page changes with it. The 6.50% is the 5.75% quoted plus a company premium.

◧ worked out from local rents

What will it cost me to buy?Breakdown

£60,800 + refurb costs

And about £13,522 more over five years, because it loses £225 every month you hold it — before any repair. That already assumes the rent never falls.

£60,800 to buy it

deposit · stamp duty · solicitor · fees~£13,862, unseen

□ works not inspected

What would have to be true?The working

£55,000 off and it stops losing money

At the asking price you feed it £225 a month. At £124,506 the rent covers everything — leaving stamp duty of £6,225 at that price.

offer £124,506

asked £180,000

◧ worked back from the rent■ stamp duty re-bandedrounded down to £5,000 — the rent it works back from is an estimate

Is the price right?The deeds

Last sold for £62,000 in 2015

Nothing nearby is comparable, but asking is 190% more than the £62,000 paid for it in 2015.

□ this address’s own deeds, no comparable saleHM Land Registry Price Paid Data

What will the rent borrow?Lender test

The rent carries £112,573 of the £135,000 loan

That £22,427 is yours to find on top of the deposit. Tested at 125% instead of 145% — a company or a basic-rate taxpayer usually is — the gap is £4,415. Lenders test the rent at 7.5% and need it to cover 145% of the payment.

£1,223 needed

more than the £1,020 rent

stressed at 7.5%, 145% cover

◧ rent after empty weeks £1,020PRA-style test

Who has to say yes?Council record

Salford council approves 70% — 64% on a cautious reading

A council-wide rate, not a forecast — and Salford council refuses schemes that sandwich a family home. Check both neighbours.

70%

0%50%100%

never approvesalways approves

the band is the cautious reading of the same 240 decisions — as low as 64%

■ Article 4 — planning permission requireddecision record held for this authority

How big is it, really?The plan

One figure, and nothing checking it 790 sq ft

Only the agent’s figure exists for this house. Open for what that means.

□ area unchecked — agent’s own

Is it a good location?Open the map

Manchester, M28 3WS

1 of 4 schools in this postcode area rated Good or Outstanding and flood risk checking… — open for the map, the schools and the rest.

Article 4Planning permission required to let by the room

■ postcode area, not this address

What to know before you offerThe checks

Every tenancy here is periodic, with no Section 21 to end it

Tenancies are now periodic, with no Section 21 — budget a longer void.

1 problem found · 2 came back clear · 4 we could not check · 2 do not apply to this property

■ from the Renters’ Rights Act 2025listing last seen 01 Sep 2026

Which strategy wins?The ways to run it

Short-stay let beats Guaranteed council rent by £341 a month

Your controls are set to Standard rental — £398 a month behind Short-stay let.

Short-stay let+£173 · £74,662 in

3 nearby short-lets within 20 km · low confidence

Guaranteed council rent−£168 · £74,662 in

Standard rental−£225 · £74,662 in

Housing-benefit rent−£435 · £74,662 in

Each row: money kept a month, then the cash it ties up. Not compared: Rent by the room (only 2 bedrooms) · Do it up, then remortgage (pays back at the remortgage) · Buy, improve & sell (pays out on sale)

◧ 4 ways, one measureranked on money kept each month, at the asking price

What would you walk away with, after 5 years?The five-year sums

−£20,845 after five years on the cash you put in, before tax on the sale

Less than the same cash would have made in a savings account, after tax on the interest. The savings account’s capital is not at risk; the property’s is. A fall of about 27% in the price would leave nothing from a sale after selling costs, and you would still owe the lender any shortfall. That is the £74,662 you put in. The 5-year fix runs past this 5-year hold, so the rate reset comes after it.

−£74,662+£208,683−£5,217−£135,000−£14,648−£20,845

Cash you put inSale valueSelling costsMortgageRent lossesYou are down

◧ 2.0%/yr growth assumed